Let's see some of these animal testing pros that makes proponents of animal experimentation argue for use of animals in research. We hope you find the information useful in your advocacy for research animals. For these reasons, scientists can confidently apply the results of a panoply of medical experiments on animals to human beings and be more confident when it's time to experiment on humans directly in clinical trials. Animals are just suffering and dying in vain by being subjects in dangerous tests that do not even have direct human benefits. Yes, many of these times the animal is inflicted with the condition on purpose, but once a cure or treatment is found they receive it.
Medical breakthroughs are one thing, but when it comes to products that are designed merely to make our everyday lives a little easier, animal testing begins to look a little more suspect. But what is really inhumane and unethical are the poor research procedures used by some facilities. The product being tested on the animal, for instance, may never satisfy the requirements needed in order to be released to the public due to any number of problems or unintended side effects. Animals however, are never asked for their opinion and have never had their rights safeguarded. As you can see, the drug was almost shelved because it proved dangerous for animals, which could have lead to the difficulty of lowering the risk of organ rejection during transplants. Animal testing pros include the fact that many safety issues are eliminated before the products reach the consumer, including the potential for deadly reactions. Advances in breast cancer, brain trauma, leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis and tuberculosis are directly attributable to animal experimentation, and without testing on chimpanzees, there would be no hepatitis B vaccine.
Testing began… 1339 Words 6 Pages millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Animals are in a great deal of stress as they are not living in their natural habitat and the controlled environment may take a toll on their minds. When you consider that there are labs that breed animals specifically for the purpose of testing and then sell them off when the next project comes along, even the animals themselves come at a great cost. Such cruelty has to be definitely punished and cannot be ignored. It has been proven that over 92% of drugs that claim to pass the animal trials fail when tested on humans by the Humane Society of the United States. With stem cell research and genetics getting a push, animals are subjected to further animal cruelty.
Of Cures and Creatures Great and Small Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. In addition to this, animal testing has also helped in the refinement of procedures, related to measuring the blood pressure, pacemaker technology and the perfection of the heart and lung disease treatments. American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance. However, if the research is claimed to save or improve human lives, then opinions shift, even if those claims are hypothetical or baseless. Most historians trace the beginning… 2973 Words 12 Pages cabinet has been tested on an animal at one point or another.
This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved — not simply from avoidance of the dangers of drugs but because the drugs themselves save lives as well as improve the quality of human life. Obviously in the Western world, we value animals as one with man. Other than mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs, the lengthy list of animals used in research labs also includes fruit flies, frogs, cats, dogs, pigs and non-human primates. Another option we have for testing today is using tiny amounts of a drug on human volunteers. But, you can't compare that with the months of torture the animals go through while the experiments are on. Thus, animal testing is not something to be blacklisted completely.
Animals do not have the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans do and because of this they have been treated differently than humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. I agree it could help solve cures and deaths but I think that things happen for a reason, and that their is probably a better way to get through cancer and other deseases. Fewer animals are used in research than as food for humans Compared to the amount of chicken, cattle, sheep and pigs that humans eat, relatively few of them are used in experimentation. Several drugs have passed animal testing, but have been found to be harmful to humans. To illustrate, for every chicken used in research, an equivalent of 340 are used as food. He's a big chungus He's a big chunky boy Such a big bun, yes We are so overjoyed To have a big chunky boy A big and wonderful chungus such as he. Human lives should not be put at risks by letting them volunteer for testing medicines for potential toxicity or side effects, as well as for manipulating genes.
About 4% of the animals that are involved in ongoing research projects are covered by animal welfare laws. First, animal advocates needs to on , and then communicate that effectively. Animal advocates believe that all creatures should have the same rights as humans The 1634 Words 6 Pages The pros and cons of personality testing Introduction The test that measure a person's enduring traits and their characteristics, which are nonphysical and nonmental is referred to as a personality test. In some cases, they can continue to study across several generations. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Studying interrelated processes is also best done in subjects with endocrine system, immune system, and central nervous system, something humans and animals have. Unfortunately, vivisection, or the practice of animal experimentation, is perfectly acceptable and legal.
Supporters for animal testing argue that research is justified because it assists in discovering ways to help people and other animals for the future. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. Human genes cloned into microorganisms can yield more specific toxicology results, for example, than simply administering toxins to animals. The process of testing on animals has been around for along time and continues to be used in many industries. However, the accuracy of computer simulations is less than animal testing.